Pentingnya Bukti Forensik Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana

Penulis

  • Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v3i2.82

Kata Kunci:

Bukti Forensik, Alat Bukti, Tindak Pidana

Abstrak

Kompleksitas kejahatan menjadikan aparat penegak hukum kesulitan dalam mengumpulkan alat bukti. Bukti forensik menjadi semakin penting dalam proses pembuktian suatu tindak pidana. Pemanfaatan bukti forensik oleh aparat penegak hukum dalam upaya menyatakan dan membuktikan seseorang bersalah atau telah melakukan tindak pidana dengan keyakinan penuh. Pentingnya bukti forensik dalam pembuktian tindak pidana terletak pada kemampuan untuk menyediakan informasi penting tentang bagaimana kejahatan dilakukan dan siapa yang melakukannya, informasi mana yang dapat digunakan dalam pembuktian dan informasi tersebut dapat diterima dan diyakini oleh hakim untuk menentukan seseorang bersalah atau telah terbukti melakukan tindak pidana.

Referensi

Bakhtiar, H. S. The Regulation Of Autopsy In Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 17-23.

Bakhtiar, H. S., Sofyan, A. M., Muhadar, M., & Soewondo, S. S. (2019). The essence of autopsy in the criminal investigation process. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 9-16.

Barclay, D. (2013). Using forensic science in major crime inquiries. In Handbook of forensic science (pp. 371-414). Willan.

Brettell, T. A., Butler, J. M., & Almirall, J. R. (2011). Forensic science. Analytical Chemistry, 83(12), 4539-4556.

Byard, R., & Payne-James, J. (2015). Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. Academic Press.

Carrier, B., & Spafford, E. H. (2003). Getting physical with the digital investigation process. International Journal of digital evidence, 2(2), 1-20.

Chisum, W. J., Turvey, B. E., & Freeman, J. (2011). Crime Scene Investigation. Crime Reconstruction, 147.

Churchill, D. (2019). History, periodization and the character of contemporary crime control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(4), 475-492.

Cole, S. A., & Dioso-Villa, R. (2006). CSI and its effects: Media, juries, and the burden of proof. New Eng. L. Rev., 41, 435.

Crozier, W. E., Luke, T. J., & Strange, D. (2020). Taking the bait: Interrogation questions about hypothetical evidence may inflate perceptions of guilt. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(9), 902-925.

Daniel, L. (2011). Digital forensics for legal professionals: understanding digital evidence from the warrant to the courtroom. Elsevier.

Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2002). Evidence, pragmatics, and justification. The Philosophical Review, 111(1), 67-94.

Fisher, B. A. (2003). Techniques of crime scene investigation. crc Press.

Fraser, J. (2020). Forensic science: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Gardner, R. M., & Krouskup, D. (2018). Practical crime scene processing and investigation. CRC Press.

Gervey, B. M., Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Differential use of person information in decisions about guilt versus innocence: The role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 17-27.

Giannelli, P. C. (2008). Forensic science: under the microscope. Ohio NUL Rev., 34, 315.

Girard, J. E. (2021). Criminalistics: Forensic science, crime, and terrorism. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Hira, S., & Furumitsu, I. (2002). Polygraphic examinations in Japan: Application of the guilty knowledge test in forensic investigations. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 4(1), 16-27.

Houck, M. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2009). Fundamentals of forensic science. Academic Press.

Kader, M., Ling, S. T. W., & Li, S. K. L. (2011). The use of DNA forensic evidence in criminal justice. Sing. L. Rev., 29, 35.

Kaplan, J., Ling, S., & Cuellar, M. (2020). Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States. Science & Justice, 60(3), 263-272.

Kaplan, J., Ling, S., & Cuellar, M. (2020). Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States. Science & Justice, 60(3), 263-272.

Kiely, T. F. (2005). Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law. CRC Press.

Kraska, P. B., Brent, J. J., & Neuman, W. L. (2020). Criminal justice and criminology research methods. Routledge.

Kurland, M. (2009). Irrefutable Evidence: Adventures in the History of Forensic Science. Rowman & Littlefield.

Larson, D. O., Vass, A. A., & Wise, M. (2011). Advanced scientific methods and procedures in the forensic investigation of clandestine graves. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(2), 149-182.

Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, error, and criminal law: an essay in legal epistemology. Cambridge University Press.

Lee, H. C., & Pagliaro, E. M. (2013). Forensic evidence and crime scene investigation. Journal of Forensic Investigation, 1(2), 1-5.

Lieberman, J. D., Carrell, C. A., Miethe, T. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2008). Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(1), 27.

Ling, S., Kaplan, J., & Berryessa, C. M. (2021). The importance of forensic evidence for decisions on criminal guilt. Science & justice, 61(2), 142-149.

Nickell, J., & Fischer, J. F. (2014). Crime science: methods of forensic detection. University Press of Kentucky.

Pearson, J. M., Law, J. R., Skene, J. A., Beskind, D. H., Vidmar, N., Ball, D. A., ... & Skene, J. H. (2018). Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt. Nature human behaviour, 2(11), 856-866.

Peterson, J. L., Hickman, M. J., Strom, K. J., & Johnson, D. J. (2013). Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Journal of forensic sciences, 58, S78-S90.

Ramiyanto, R. (2017). Bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah dalam hukum acara pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(3), 463-484.

Ribaux, O., Walsh, S. J., & Margot, P. (2006). The contribution of forensic science to crime analysis and investigation: forensic intelligence. Forensic science international, 156(2-3), 171-181.

Roux, C., Crispino, F., & Ribaux, O. (2012). From forensics to forensic science. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(1), 7-24.

Science and Technology Select Committee. (2019). Forensic science and the criminal justice system: a blueprint for change. House of Lords, London.

Stelfox, P. (2013). Criminal investigation: An introduction to principles and practice. Willan.

Strom, K. J., & Hickman, M. J. (2010). Unanalyzed evidence in law‐enforcement agencies: A national examination of forensic processing in police departments. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(2), 381-404.

Thompson, W. C., & Schumann, E. L. (2017). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor’s fallacy and the defense attorney’s fallacy. In Expert Evidence and Scientific Proof in Criminal Trials. Routledge. pp. 371-391.

Tilley, N., & Townsley, M. (2013). Forensic science in UK policing: strategies, tactics and effectiveness. In Handbook of forensic science (pp. 359-379). Willan.

Vaciago, G., & Ramalho, D. S. (2016). Online searches and online surveillance: the use of trojans and other types of malware as means of obtaining evidence in criminal proceedings. Digital Evidence & Elec. Signature L. Rev., 13, 88.

Van Es, R., de Keijser, J., Kunst, M., & van Doorn, J. (2022). The effects of forensic mental health reports on decisions about guilt in the Netherlands: an experimental approach. International journal of law and psychiatry, 80, 101760.

Vlassis, D., & Williams, P. (2013). Combating transnational crime: concepts, activities and responses. Routledge.

Webster, C. W. R. (2009). CCTV policy in the UK: Reconsidering the evidence base. Surveillance and society, 6(1), 10-22.

White, P. (Ed.). (2010). Crime scene to court: the essentials of forensic science. Royal society of chemistry.

Wüllenweber, S., & Giles, S. (2021). The effectiveness of forensic evidence in the investigation of volume crime scenes. Science & Justice, 61(5), 542-554.

Hukumonline. (2013). Hakim Harusnya Pertimbangkan Bukti Forensik. diakses pada: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/hakim-harusnya-pertimbangkan-bukti-forensik-lt51c2bf0658f3c/

Kompas.com. (2022). Benarkah Ferdy Sambo Intervensi. Benarkah Ferdy Sambo Intervensi Saksi?". Diakses pada: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/11/09/09472091/benarkah-ferdy-sambo-intervensi-saksi

kompas.com. (2016). Jaksa Minta Majelis Hakim Kesampingkan Keterangan Para Ahli dari Pihak Jessica. Diakses pada: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2016/10/05/16305151/jaksa.minta.majelis.hakim.kesampingkan.keterangan.para.ahli.dari.pihak.jessica

Metrotvnews. (2022). Hakim Meragukan Keterangan Daden yang Berbeda dengan Saksi Lain. Diakses pada : https://www.metrotvnews.com/play/koGCVGj8-hakim-meragukan-keterangan-daden-yang-berbeda-dengan-saksi-lain

Diterbitkan

2022-11-30
Abstrak viewed = 237 times